The Union of PLM and ERP, PLM & Decision Making, Product Data: Finding It - Using It (6)

   

2PLM Newsletter

John Stark Associates                                                                                                                                          November 19, 2012 - Vol15 #15

Welcome to the 2PLM e-zine

This issue includes :

 RSS Feed for 2PLM

NB. If you are viewing this page as a guest you only have limited access to our community.
Please take time to register and you will gain a lot of additional great features including:
More SEARCH results, tags, newsletter archives, and much more. Not yet registered?  It's easy and it's free!

The Union of PLM and ERP
by Roger Tempest
 
After 3 events in 2 continents, and 18 participants from 6 countries, the PLM-ERP initiative is on course to produce the definitive Version 3.0 PLM-ERP Handbook by the end of January.

The Handbook alone, however, is not enough. There is also a PLM-ERP Primer (see 2PLM Oct. 22) that encapsulates the business and management issues into an accessible working document; and the technical areas require the application of the Product Structure Standard and a new Data Management Manual. All of these will be published alongside the Handbook as part of the PLMIG membership material for 2013.

Most importantly, the concept of 'a single product management system for the entire enterprise, that manages the data from its first inception right through the manufacturing and build to field service and support', has been shown to be correct. After the first Workshop in Bristol this was outlined in 2PLM Sep. 24 as "PLM=ERP", but it is better expressed as: "PLMuERP" - the Union of PLM and ERP.

 
This concept of having PLM and ERP people, processes and technology working together in a harmonised way is fundamental to what we are trying to achieve. No longer are we talking about fixing a split between two computer platforms by using some kind of "interface sticking plaster". We are now working on the basis of a union between PLM and ERP in which everyone feels part of the same team, and works towards the same goals by following the same plans.

This may sound like common sense, but if you look around your own company you may see that there is still some way to go. That is why the PLMuERP annotation is useful - it helps keep everybody's mind on the new paradigm.

 

Roger Tempest is co-founder of the PLMIG. Membership of the PLMIG is available via membership@plmig.com.


 
PLM & Decision Making
by Scott Cleveland
 
from Jim Brown of Tech-Clarity
Given the important role of engineering decision-making in product development, manufacturers should treat it as a core competency. Manufacturers must enable decision-makers to make better, more confident decisions. They should also enable engineers to make decisions efficiently and get them right the first time to optimize product development time, reduce time-consuming design rework, and improve time to market. Optimizing engineering decisions is ultimately about driving greater success and profitability of products.

My Thoughts....
I first started in this business many years ago with Sherpa Corporation. At that time, our president used to say that our software gets 'the right information to the right person at the right time'. I remember that I didn't think that was a very good sales pitch.

 
Now that some time has passed, I am thinking that he was right. And, decision-making is the driving force. If we can get the right information to the person needing to make a decision at the time they need to make the decision, this will give them the opportunity to make the 'best decision' possible at that time.

That 'best decision' allows them to optimize product development time, reduce time-consuming design rework, and improve time to market resulting in decreased costs and increased revenues.

 

Your Thoughts....
Does this seem logical?

Scott Cleveland can be contacted on +1 408-464-6387
 


Product Data: Finding It - Using It by Deploying a Search Engine Solution (6)
by Dick Bourke
 
Preface
In Part 5, brief descriptions of the two dimensions of searching methods were presented: Deep (full text) and Wide (unified access). The purpose of this Part 6 is to describe the general searching process in two phases: Initial and subsequent. For readers who have done on-line shopping, these processes will look familiar. With SESs, however, the navigational aids are more extensive.

Initial searching process
A key component of an SES is a purpose-designed user interface (UI) that is focused on the needs of engineering and manufacturing users. A single point-of-access eliminates the need for multiple sign-ons.

When a user enters a search criteria - a word or phrase - in the UI, the SES presents an initial results list to the user for further analysis and action. To facilitate this process, an SES may use powerful techniques for normalizing and classifying data by use of thesauri - think synonyms. The means to relate similar terms include 1) Taxonomy (hierarchical relationships) and/or 2) Ontology (a network of relationships) methodologies.

To supplement this discussion, look at some representative vendor offerings, for example, Actify, Alcove9, Exalead (Exalead ii) and Siemens (Active WorkSpace). Notice, their displays that appear will be remarkably similar. These initial search results are surrounded by several navigational aids and refinement methods showing possible areas to explore further. Claims of "intuitive" are valid. New users should be able to quickly grasp the exploration possibilities with minimal training.

Using Deep/Wide search capabilities, the presented results are generated by driving past metadata to access desired content in every relevant record; the search criteria are highlighted in each listed record containing it. Typically, thumbnail previews of images will also be shown. These displays of retrieved results then can be iteratively refined to narrow the results list to find data that is most "relevant" - a key capability in semantic technology and in an SES.

Relevant
Relevant - the desired search end is an "a ha" moment. Two factors come into play: 1) SES algorithms and 2) user actions. In the world of semantic technology, the end is still the same; the means are based on various algorithms. These determine the ranking of the results to be presented by taking into account any number of factors, such as frequency and proximity of the criteria to other words. Relevant ranking methods can range from simple to highly complex - based on sophisticated mathematical logic.

In addition to the displayed results, a user will see filtering choices to narrow subsequent searches, e.g., dates and file types are two examples of many. 


  
Further exploration is highly likely; a typical initial search may reveal hundreds of choices. Thus, the second factor is the ability of a user to determine the correct choices for further discovery and ultimately, decision-making.

Subsequent searching process

Getting to the relevant data needed for a timely decision, therefore, is also a function of the user's ability to take advantage of the displayed navigational aids, e.g., the capability of an SES to show relationships as an aid to decision-making, such as all related documents for a CAD drawing.

Moreover, further refinements to the selection criteria may be in order. Some familiar refinements include:

  1. Boolean logic with AND/OR/NOT operators
  2. Wild card entries
  3. Mandatory, prohibited, and optional clauses
  4. Sub-expressions - use parenthesis to compose a query of smaller queries
  5. Field qualifier - explicitly search a particular field
  6. Phrase query - a series of words to be matched in a stated order

Faceted navigation is also a key discovery tool. Facets are the categories into which the SES has grouped relevant records, with a number of them in each category. In turn, the records in a particular category may include several types. Thus, faceted navigation helps the user to identify and select a specific category for further exploration.

Now, the significance of Deep and Wide searching should be more obvious. With Deep, a user is assured that all search criteria have been identified; with Wide, a user is assured that all designated files have been accessed.

From a user's standpoint, the SES will have done its job when relevant data is presented. To keep the power of an SES in perspective, though, bear in mind that algorithms can't judge quality and any duplications aren't removed, just identified. Once again, well-informed users are crucial to getting results with an SES.

Accordingly, the essence of effectively using an SES is to make timely decisions that markedly and positively affect the enterprise's strategic objectives, such as improving "Time-to-Market" by reducing the costs, times and risks of product development.

 

What's Next
In Part 7, Comments and answers to questions.
Please direct questions to me at dickb@bourkeconsulting.com


Small Ad Section

 

2PLM Newsletter introduces Small Ad section

We are now accepting small ads for this section of the 2PLM Newsletter. Up to 100 words and no graphics for $200/€150 per insertion. Discounts available for multiple insertions and repeat advertisers: please see 2PLM Sponsorship Opportunities for further details.

 

 

 

                                                    

 

PLM News

sponsored by:   

                                    

Corporate

Siemens announced the acquisition of LMS International NV. Details 

Financial

Autodesk, Inc. reported financial results for the third quarter of fiscal year 2013. Revenue was $548 million. Details

Cimatron Limited announced financial results for the third quarter of 2012. Revenues were $9.5 million. Details

 

Implementations

AVEVA announced that Electricite De France has expanded its investment in AVEVA technology. Details

CDS announced that Dorner Manufacturing Corporation has integrated the CDS ModelServer with their new CAD Configurator. Details 

Dassault Systemes announced that Pratt & Whitney Canada has selected the 3DEXPERIENCE platform. Details

Intergraph announced that KDHEC has selected Intergraph SmartPlant Enterprise solutions. Details

PTC announced that Cabela's has chosen PTC Windchill FlexPLM software. Details

TraceParts announced that Pneumadyne is using TracePartsOnline.net. Details 

Developments

ANSYS announced ANSYS 14.5. Details

Autodesk, Inc. introduced Autodesk 123D Design. Details

CD-adapco announced the release of STAR-CCM+ v7.06. Details

Centric Software, Inc. announced it will offer a Software Developer's Kit (SDK) for its mobile product lifecycle management (PLM) apps. Details

Delcam announced new probing capabilities in the 2013 version of its FeatureCAM feature-based CAM software. Details

FARO Technologies, Inc. announced SCENE 5.1. Details

Intergraph introduced a Leica TruView Integrator for SmartPlant Enterprise. Details

IronCAD, LLC announced the release of the IronCAD Design Collaboration Suite 2013. Details

Kenesto Corp. announced availability of its latest solution update. Details

Lattice Technology, Inc. announced the availability of iXVL Publisher v2.0. Details

Materialise announced the launch of Magics17. Details

Missler Software announced TopSolid'Split 7.7. Details

Siemens PLM Software announced Version 61.0 of the 2D D-Cubed software components. Details

SofTech, Inc. announced the availability of ProductCenter PLM version 9.3.0. Details

3D Systems announced the availability of its VIDAR DiagnosticPRO Edge digitizer. Details

3D Systems announced its first customizable photo app, Cubify Pics. Details 

Relationships

Aras announced that Applied Technology Company has joined the Aras Partner Program. Details 

 Product                         Lifecycle                         Management: Paradigm for 21st Century Product                         Realisation

Granta Design announced a partnership with Siemens PLM Software. Details 

Other

The Adept Group announced availability of a White Paper, "Strategizing, Road Mapping and Executing the Product Line". Details

Arena Solutions announced it finished its fiscal third quarter of 2012 with solid growth. Details

Autodesk, Inc. announced findings from a survey of Autodesk PLM 360 customers. Details

AVEVA announced it has won the techMARK Company of the Year award. Details

Creaform announced results for Q3 of 2012. Details

Dassault Systemes announced the launch of a new industry solution experience for aerospace and defense companies called "Winning Program." Details

Dassault Systemes announced it has been recognized by IDC as a leading PLM provider for the retail market in its recent report, "IDC MarketScape: Worldwide Retail Product Life-Cycle Management (PLM) Applications 2012 Vendor Assessment." Details

Delcam announced that FoFdation consortium partners gathered for a progress update. Details

Intergraph announced that Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember has selected Intergraph SmartMarine 3D. Details

Omnify Software announced it is celebrating ten years of PLM software success. Details

Siemens PLM Software announced a free High School Edition of its Solid Edge software. Details

Sopheon issued its interim management statement for the period since 1 July 2012. Details

 

 

Brief lines

Top

 To unsubscribe, please visit My account, - Newsletters- "manage my subscription" and untick the appropriate box.
 Subscription is free to registered users. Register now